On Dec 18, 11:08 pm, Paul Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ATLAS failed to compile for you. It is no surprise that starting Sage
> > afterwards fails. It isn't clear from the excerpt from the logs *why*
> > it failed, so please post the couple missing lines from there until
> > the end. Main potential culprit is power management in your case.
> > Turning that off will *probably* solve the problem.
>
> by the way, I noticed while compiling sage-2.9 from source on my laptop
> (Pentium M) that ATLAS ran MANY tuning tests, which did take VERY long.
> Wouldn't it be possible to use some default machine parameters, like GMP does?
>
Hello Paul,
#1547, William experienced that one, too. ATLAS has pretuned
parameters for a lot of CPUs, but not that particular model.I am
looking into this, but haven't had time to fix this yet. If anybody
else wants to figure it out feel free to do so, my feelings won't get
hurt :). Could you provide the output from /proc/cpuinfo?
> Cheers,
> Paul Zimmermann
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
