On 1/14/08, Lars Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you very much for your answers, > > I will continue in the proposed direction.
[integrating your code into the Sage library] If you get frustrated, please do _not_ hesitate to post to sage-support with questions. We definitely *do* want your code. It's just that in the long-run integrating it into the Sage library is optimal, since it means a good refereeing process, and that your code will be maintained in the longrun. Actually, I kind of think that if we keep pushing this approach and do it right, it will gain some credibility and perhaps someday it will be the future of publishing mathematical code. And of course every such "publication" would definitively make Sage a more capable and well tested system. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
