Dear William,
On Feb 22, 1:58 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I rename it to tensor.sage (not sure if this is a good idea),
>
> Yes, that's a VERY GOOD idea. It's really crazy to use a compiled
> spyx for the purposes of interfacing with the Singular interpreter
> via pexpect.
Sorry, using a compiled spyx was just, well, let's call it my personal
tradition.
Am i right that the loop must be re-written if it is .sage rather
than .spyx?
I think
for i from 1<=i<=len(L[2]):
is only possible in .spyx, while in .sage it should be
for i in range(1,len(L[2])+1)
@John, this would explain the new error message after renaming the
file.
However, i don't know why attaching the .spyx didn't work.
Yours
Simon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
