> > > We have real(x) is just x in Sage: > > > > sage: t = real(x) > > > t > > > sage: t > > > x
Wow, that is a problem, all right. Is there a workaround not involving defining CDF or another ring at this time? (I assume the answer is no, but I hope the answer is yes.) I want to use things like sage: f(x)=x-real(x) sage: parametric_plot( (real(f),imag(f)), 0, 1) and then just change f to get a different plot, or even substitute a parametrization in for x (like exp(i*t)); currently I get an empty graph, of course. I tried .real(), but apparently that also calls Maxima. > > > Bill Furnish is going to spend the whole summer full time (funded by > > Google!) > > > working on rewriting the symbolic calculus backend from scratch in > > Cython > > > (he's already working on this, by the way), and the hope is that > > > then he'll be able to fix many such issues. Bill -- comments? Yeah, that is great news, and sounds extremely cool - well done! - kcrisman --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
