On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Alec Mihailovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What is your point? > > Actually, I meant that more about Maplesoft. Sage support is usually good in > this group, just wasn't very good in this thread.
I see. Thanks for pointing this out and explaining further. Since you like watching this sort of thing, I think it would be great if you could continue to keep an eye on what happens regarding the quality of support in the Sage forums, and when you see something amiss, or notice that we're really doing a bad job, gently let us know. There really isn't anybody involved in the Sage project who systematically does this, and I think you're unusually talented as spotting this sort of problem. E.g., if you notice a question that goes unanswered for *days* on sage-support, maybe you could post "sorry that we haven't responded to your question -- hey does anybody have an idea about how to answer this person's question?" Thanks! -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
