On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:17 PM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 3:51 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:22 PM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Try frame_aspect_ratio, which is probably what you really want
>> given your questions.
>
> Hmm.  You're right -- that it is probably what I really want -- but I
> still don't understand aspect_ratio.  Why, if I change aspect_ratio
> from [1,1,1] to [1,1,2], do the relative scalings of the x- and y-axes
> change?  Shouldn't only the z-axis (relative to x and y) be affected?
>
> I guess I find the behavior of aspect_ratio rather unpredictable. With
>
> P = sphere()
> P.show(aspect_ratio=[a,b,c])
>
> it makes sense: the coordinate system, and hence the sphere, is
> stretched by these factors.  However, with the plot that I mentioned
> in my original post, it seems to behave oddly, as mentioned above:
> changing from [1,1,1] to [1,1,2] altered the relative scales on the x
> and y axes.

If it just doesn't make sense to you, even after you've thought about it
and read the docs, then I think it's buggy!  We can talk about it when
I'm back in Seattle (e.g., tomorrow)...

 -- William

--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to