Hi Robert, this was not a misunderstanding, there is an "n" missing :-), I corrected it: I wanted to write
then i^2 should also be of type CDF, but rather then the i^2 should also .... as an answer to your statement, namely that i^2 is getting turned into CDF(i)^CDF(2) I hope this is clear now > Generally in Sage we prefer exact arithmetic to numeric > approximations, because once you start doing numeric things one has > to deal with rounding errors, etc. and there's no going back. and that's exactly the reason why I don't understand why "i^2" is not be treated like an exact symbolic expression Georg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
