On Feb 20, 10:40 pm, Marshall Hampton <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
> I tried to give this a shot but got hung up by requests by maxima for
> additional assumptions; it wants to know the sign of the variable a,
> but from skimming that paper it looks like we don't want to assume a
> particular sign for a,b, or c. I guess it might be possible to
> exhaustively do all sign cases but maybe there is a better way.
The original poster also posted this question to the Maxima list and
5.16.3 as well as 5.17.1 both need the assumption, but the current
Maxima CVS does not any more.
Not that this is that helpful, but I just wanted to point it out ;)
> -M. Hampton
>
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
