Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> * predefining a bunch of colors in the global namespace (maybe just >> what >> is available in the current strings?) > > I like all your comments but this one--the global namespace is huge > enough as it is. Also, colors.* gives nice tab completion, etc. I > could be OK with the limited set defined above. > >> * predefining a huge number of colors, but sticking them in the colors >> namespace >> * making some nicely matched color sets (color schemes, if you will). >> * make a generic mixing function (which takes the weighted average of >> self and other, according to a specifiable fraction) >> * make darker/lighter functions >> * adding together colors averages them >> * a linear combination takes a weighted average (hmmm...have to think >> about how to do this one...maybe it'd make more sense to do a >> different >> average?) >> >> Here is what MMA does with colors: >> http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/guide/Colors.html > > +1. As well as rgb, we should offer hsb, hsv ways of constructing > colors.
Okay, see: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5601 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5602 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5603 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5604 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5605 If anyone wants to do these, feel free! Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
