On Mar 31, 11:06 am, Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, right. Duh. I should have seen that. Since you nor I did see that, should we ask if there is a way to unify the syntax for symbolic expressions and python functions to make plotting more "idiot proof" so to speak? Or maybe there is a good reason not to that I'm missing? Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [sage-support] Why plot() won't plot this function? Chris Seberino
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() won't plot this functio... Jason Grout
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() won't plot this fun... William Stein
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() won't plot this... Jason Grout
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() won't plot ... Chris Seberino
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() won't ... Jason Grout
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() won't plot this... Stan Schymanski
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() won't plot ... Jason Grout
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() won't ... Stan Schymanski
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot() wo... Jason Grout
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot(... Stan Schymanski
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot(... Jason Grout
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot(... Stan Schymanski
- [sage-support] Re: Why plot(... Robert Bradshaw
