[sage-support] Re: Why this numerical integral bombs?

[Chris Seberino]

On Apr 26, 1:36 am, mabshoff <michael.absh...@mathematik.uni-
dortmund.de> wrote:
> I do not see how that rules out clisp 2.47 - or am I just not getting
> what you are driving at :)

I meant if I can recreate the problem from 3.4 source as well as 3.4.1
source then doesn't that mean I can recreate the problem in both
version of clisp?  Hence clisp is innocent?

cs
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---