On Jun 17, 2009, at 3:05 AM, Utpal Sarkar wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
> I noticed something funny: if you call x = var("X") in some scope, it
> is X that is injected into the global scope, not x. In fact I thought
> that the argument was merely a print name.
var("X") is what makes the variable, there's nothing special about
assignment. For example, if I wrote
sage: x = var("X") + 1
then x would have the value X + 1, and as a side effect, X would be
injected into the global scope. This seems like a surprising artifact
to many people, and is certainly not like anything Python does. Was
there a strong justification for doing this?
>
>
> On Jun 17, 1:49 am, Dan Drake <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I ran into the problem discussed in this thread just the other
>> day, and
>> my solution was to use sage.symbolic.ring. How does this solution
>> compare to the others posted in this thread? Here's (basically)
>> what I
>> did:
>>
>> from sage.symbolic.ring import var as symbvar
>>
>> def foo(n, k):
>> t = symbvar('t')
>> return exp(t^k).series(t, n+1).coefficient(t, n)*factorial(n)
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> --
>> --- Dan Drake <[email protected]>
>> ----- KAIST Department of Mathematical Sciences
>> ------- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
>>
>> signature.asc
>> < 1KViewDownload
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
