Jason, Robert, I'm trying to understand the patch, but it looks like this is a fix for *all* Numpy/Scipy-Sage type issues? If so---oh happy day!
On Jul 9, 5:53 am, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > Ahmed Fasih wrote: > > Writing your own is a good way to understand the implementation issues > > that we sometimes unthinkingly rely on, but for production code, it's > > always a good idea to default to the pre-packaged implementation. > > > In this case, I think it's the standard issue with Scipy not > > understanding Sage types. This problem is described in > >http://wiki.sagemath.org/faq#Typeissuesusingscipy.2Ccvxoptornumpyfrom... > > > sage: import scipy.stats as stats > > sage: stats.binom.pmf(1,10,.56,0) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > TypeError Traceback (most recent call > > last) > > <snip> > > TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for *: 'numpy.ndarray' and > > 'numpy.bool_' > > > There are numerous fixes to this problem, one of which is: > > > sage: stats.binom.pmf(1r,10r,.56r,0r) > > 0.0034614823012532187 > > Robert Bradshaw just posted a patch to #5081 that makes this work: > > sage: from scipy import stats > sage: stats.binom.pmf(1,10,.56,0) > 0.0034614823012532187 > > (no preparser magic or anything; it just works). > > And there was much rejoicing in the land! > > Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
