Thank you for your answers !! I think I can build something from them and from William's idea of a .__getitem__ function :-)
On Aug 27, 12:50 am, Simon King <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Aug 26, 10:46 pm, Martin Albrecht <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > isn't the OP asking for the infinite polynomial ring which Simon and Mike > > wrote? > > I was wondering myself, of course. > > But in Nathann's examples, the arguments to the dictionary variables > are any strings, e.g., y["g"]*y["h"] from the original post. > > Anyway, Nathann, indeed Infinite Polynomial Rings would be a possible > approach if you address your variables by natural numbers, x[1]*x > [140]+3*y[0]*x[2], rather than by arbitrary strings. They are, of > course, described in the Sage References. > > Cheers, > Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
