On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:41 PM, linuxgus <[email protected]> wrote: > The past few days I installed Sage 4.2.1 from source on 64-bit Ubuntu > karmic with stock kernel and I also installed the binary for the Atom > N270 on a eeePC 1000, also running Ubuntu karmic (32 bit, as the Atom > is a 32-bit processor). To test things out, I executed the one-line > script 'plot(sin(x),(-3*pi,+3*pi))' and I observed that in both > environments the plot missed the (0,0) point not by much, perhaps a > couple of pixels, but enough to be observable. (0,0) was clearly > outside the plot pixels.
You might enjoy drawing a bigger version of the same plot: plot(sin(x),(-3*pi,+3*pi)).show(figsize=[20,30]) > Since this happened on two very different architectures and two very > different graphics cards, I would tend to suspect that this is > architecture-independent. > > Gus Fantanas > > -- > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
