I felt ambivalent about adding the "->" until this point. If "->" is going to mean something else in python eventually, it seems like a bad idea to overload it in a Sage-specific way.
-Marshall On Dec 14, 10:01 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Note that -> gets a meaning in Python 3, to annotate the result of a > function: > > def foo(a: int) -> float: > ... > > I don't think this is a technical problem as one can rely on the > statement to start with "def", but at least -> already means something. > > Dag Sverre -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
