On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Martin Rubey
<martin.ru...@math.uni-hannover.de> wrote:
> Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> writes:
>
>> 3. Use an alternative system for evaluating the integral, like sympy or
>> mathematica_free
>
> ceterum censeo:
>
> sage: fricas.integrate('sec(t)*tan(t)','t=0..%pi/3','"noPole"')
> 1
>
>
> the noPole argument instructs FriCAS to ignore possible poles that the
> integral without limits could have:
>
> sage: fricas.integrate('sec(t)*tan(t)','t')
>
> cos(t) + 1
> ----------
> cos(t)
>
> I admit however, that calling FriCAS from sage is very awkward, since
> the interface is absolutely dumb.
Could you please give constructive criticism instead? I for one
appreciate the work Bill Page did at Sage Days 2 to write an axiom
interface. I think enumerating some specific criticism of it would
be more useful. If you've already done so, maybe you could post a
link?
William
>
> I think that's a shame, because FriCAS is quite good at differential
> algebra.
>
> Martin
>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
