> Is anyone working on improving the Sage -> R integration? Yes. There are a number of tickets with some progress on them.
> > Making Sage good for statistics, would probably do far more to increase the > user > base of Sage than improving graph theory, algebra or number theory. My logic > for > that is that statistics is used by a huge range of professions, whereas number > theory is really only if interest to mathematicians. This has been discussed quite a bit on this list, and we agree. > I do subscribe to the R mailing list - I needed to subscribe to get some help > over a Solaris issue, and have remained a subscriber, though I rarely read the > messages. The mailing list is *very* active. R certainly has a huge user > base. I > subscribed on the 12th Feb this year, and now have 10,703 messages! That's > about > 100 per day! Yes! It's amazing. That's why I get the digest :) This is as good a time as any to mention that John Verzani invited me to give a talk at useR2010! (the exclamation point is part of the title, so no Nathann here), and I'm going! This is at http://www.user2010.org/program.html#Mi and http://www.user2010.org/abstracts/Crisman.pdf . Feel free to let me know all of the best ways to use them *together* (I already have lots of examples of using R in the notebook, including the great lattice plotting packages which do now work in the notebook). - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
