On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:35 PM, m.rebolledo
<[email protected]> wrote:
> thank you but the solution that you proposed seem to tell "abort if
> the process is too long" and I would like to do something like "while
> R_c is too long to factorized, do c:=c+1".
> is it possible with @fork?

What is the definition of "too long to factorize"?

>
> sorry if it is obvious ...
>
> On 16 juil, 12:40, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 07/16/10 11:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:36 AM, troublion<[email protected]>  
>> > wrote:
>> >> hello,
>>
>> >> within a procedure I need to factorize an integer R_c depending on a
>> >> parameter c which I can change if I want. But this integer can be very
>> >> big (like 170 digits or more...) so sage could not factorize it. I
>> >> would like to say to sage something like "if you can, factorize it,
>> >> else look at R_{c+1}".
>> >> Is it possible? How?
>> >> thank you very much in advance,
>>
>> > My new @fork decorator is perfect for this, which you get from
>> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9501, or wait for sage-4.5.1
>> > (in 2-3 weeks).
>>
>> > Code:
>>
>> > @fork(timeout=1)
>> > def fac1(n):
>> >      return factor(n)
>>
>> > Usage:
>>
>> > sage: fac1(2903482093840982)
>> > 2 * 15907 * 26203 * 3482971
>> > sage: fac1(2^97+1)
>> > 3 * 971 * 1553 * 31817 * 1100876018364883721
>> > sage: fac1(2^997+1)
>> > Killing subprocess 94648 with input
>> > ((1339385758982834151185531311325002263201756014631917009304687985462938813
>> >  
>> > 906170153116497973519619822659493341146941433531483931607115392554498072196
>> >  
>> > 837321850491820971853028873177634325632796392734744272769130809372947742658
>> >  
>> > 424845944895692993259632864321399559710817770957553728956578048354650708508
>> >  673,),
>> > {}) which took too long
>> > 'NO DATA (timed out)'
>>
>> Mathematica has two related to this
>>
>> http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/TimeConstrained.htmlhttp://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/MemoryConstrained.html
>>
>> It might be useful if Sage could implement the latter too.
>>
>> Dave
>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org
>



-- 
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to