Yeah, I spotted that after I posted my above post. Well, not spotted, more that I finally understood the line. The first time I read it, I didn't notice that the second lambda didn't have an x before the :
Thanks, Joal Heagney -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
