On Apr 17, 6:20 pm, Ian Petrow <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow. Great. Thanks. > > Ian > > On Apr 17, 3:12 pm, achrzesz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > sage: numerical_integral(lambda t:imaginary(gamma(1-I*t)),-15,15) > > (0.0, 5.3925521851144085e-15) >
Also, sage: X = imaginary(gamma(1-I*t)) sage: X.nintegral(t,-15,15) (0.0, 1.736560984948425e-15, 21, 2) works. See #8321 and #7763 for related tickets which will (someday) make it clear that Sage *does* have great numerical integration, we just don't expose the four or five varieties we have very well! - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
