On 04/30/11 09:59 PM, Alex Lara wrote:
The command ./sage -f python (after install libssl-dev) did not work,
but  sage -f python-2.6.4.p10.spkg did work (I think).
I ran make test. The following test failed:

        sage -t  -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/
number_field.py"

Do you think my build is ok now?

Best regards---Alex

In a word, No. What version of Sage are you trying to build?

Can you show us the output of the test log file (test.log, ptest.log, ptestlong.log or whatever it is in your case). We need to see the bit where the test fails - not the complete log.

If you have not run the long tests, I suggest you run them too.


$ make testlong
(run each test serially)

or

$ make ptestlong
(if you have a multi-core and/or multi-processor machine, which will run tests in parallel to reduce the time needed to run them).

I have a faint recollection of "number_field.py" might have failed on one of the recent alpha releases, but has been fixed. Depending on what you are using, you might have hit a problem that's been solved. But I could be mistaken about this anyway - I lose track of the test failures, which are quite common in the early alpha releases.


--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

--
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to