PARI doesn't have a log_repr() to begin with, so I don't see how that's relevant.
On Sunday 03 Jun 2012, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-06-03 12:14, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > 2) K.multiplicative_generator() currently returns a random generator, but > > for the GivaroGFq implementation we should simply return the generator > > which has internal representation '1', i.e., the guy we actually use to > > represent the elements. Once this done log_repr() will also start to > > make sense again. > > On the other hand, doing this for the Givaro interface but not for the > PARI interface (where logs are never used) is also confusing. I would > say: leave things as they are. Note that the generator is not "random", > it is deterministic. Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF _www: http://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/ _jab: [email protected] -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
