Slumberland <[email protected]> writes: > It wouldn't hurt to make a fuss about this, generate some more noise. I've > dug > through a lot of SAGE documentation over the last month without running into > so > much as a peep about the (poor) state of the display methods.
I agree! But I think you might find a more suitable audience in sage-devel than in sage-support :) > To this point, I have found it easier and faster to render entire scenes of > geometric arguments in Blender -- with lighting and fully manipulable 3D > objects, textures, materials-- than get a basic, manipulable plot in SAGE. > > I am so glad this is a major goal. > > I don't think it takes away from the advances SAGE has made to be blunt about > this, and point vigorously to future changes like this. The tools are > desperately needed. I listen to Sal say he just doesn't know where to find a > good, free, general plotting program to use in his videos, repeatedly when I > visit Khan Academy. > > Meanwhile, half of the reason I decided to use SAGE is because I love caging > myself with bitterly difficult problems. Given the choice, I'll work out the > mechanics from scratch anyway, for the practice. :) > > Most people don't. :( > > I will be able to help soon. So much still to learn. Again, you're welcome to join us in sage-devel! If you need any pointers, there are plenty of knowledgeable people who watch that list. -Keshav -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
