On 21 October 2012 12:03, LFS <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hiya Dave,
> What would the line of code look like to reseed it with the epoch thing each
> time I call it?
> Thanks so much,
>
> Linda


http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/misc/randstate.html

says

If set_random_seed() is called with no arguments, then a new seed is
automatically selected. On operating systems that support it, the new
seed comes from os.urandom(); this is intended to be a truly random
(not pseudo-random), cryptographically secure number. (Whether it is
actually cryptographically secure depends on operating system details
that are outside the control of Sage.)


I tend to disagree with what's quoted there. The seed will be truely
random, but the sequence of numbers will not be. They will still be
preudo random.

Sage no doubt has endless ways of generating random numbers, and that
method might only work for one or more of the RNGs, but not all of
them.


Dave
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-support" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.


Reply via email to