Hi, So the sage server that I was running went down and all the published worksheets are gone now. Does anyone know how I can recover them?
Thanks, Nathan On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:46 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Today's Topic Summary > > Group: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/topics > > - demo server down <#13a8ebba02c84201_group_thread_0> [4 Updates] > - MIP variables arithmetic very slow?<#13a8ebba02c84201_group_thread_1>[5 > Updates] > - SAGE IOS app <#13a8ebba02c84201_group_thread_2> [7 Updates] > - Bug in p.add_constraint ? <#13a8ebba02c84201_group_thread_3> [8 > Updates] > - Upper convex hull ("inverse" Newton > polygon)<#13a8ebba02c84201_group_thread_4>[5 Updates] > > demo server > down<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/t/7884412fadcbfea> > > Safia Yonker <[email protected]> Oct 23 08:37AM -0700 > > Hello Jason, If you wouldn't mind restarting the demo server one more > time. > I have one more round of documents shared with me by students that I > need > to download before I am completely switched > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/2a7650a49bdb24cc> > > > Jason Grout <[email protected]> Oct 23 11:21AM -0500 > > On 10/23/12 10:37 AM, Safia Yonker wrote: > > time. I have one more round of documents shared with me by students > > that I need to download before I am completely switched to the main > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/2d31cac495600d5e> > > > William Stein <[email protected]> Oct 23 10:37AM -0700 > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Jason Grout > >> sagenb.org and I won't pester you about this again. > > > I think William might be migrating demo to a new server > architecture. I'm > > not sure where he > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/4a1f0ecca2834b2b> > > > Jason Grout <[email protected]> Oct 23 12:45PM -0500 > > On 10/23/12 12:37 PM, William Stein wrote: > >> not sure where he is in this process, so I'll let him comment here. > > > I haven't touched it yet (been busy with students). I likely won't > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/66e032a9ca65ff55> > > MIP variables arithmetic very > slow?<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/t/557036b4df5f4a7e> > > Peter Mueller <[email protected]> Oct 23 06:42AM -0700 > > Sorry for bombing this list with my MIP problems. Here is another > thing, > again in Sage 5.3: > > The following (senseless) test code > > P = MixedIntegerLinearProgram() > x = P.new_variable(binary=True) > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/315f6cbbf9292155> > > > Volker Braun <[email protected]> Oct 23 07:29AM -0700 > > I don't understand why all the copying goes on in mip.pyx, maybe > Nathan can > comment? I think the method would be much faster without deepcopy(). > Just > shallow copy stuff into new dicts. > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/b86c271b814df469> > > > Volker Braun <[email protected]> Oct 23 07:31AM -0700 > > Profiling info: > > sage: P = MixedIntegerLinearProgram() > sage: x = P.new_variable(binary=True) > sage: %prun for i in [0..29]: c = sum(x[j]*(j-i) for j in [0..29]) > 608747 function calls > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/4cd3d79c15312a92> > > > Peter Mueller <[email protected]> Oct 23 07:45AM -0700 > > Dear Volker, > > importing Sum from sage.numerical.mip and replacing all occurrences of > sum > with Sum fixed the problem of the long running times, thanks a lot! > > Such important information should be > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/a8cb377ff33e4164> > > > Volker Braun <[email protected]> Oct 23 08:01AM -0700 > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 3:45:56 PM UTC+1, Peter Mueller wrote: > > > with Sum fixed the problem of the long running times, thanks a lot > > Such important information should be in the docs, a naive > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/24e1ef6d542cccc1> > > SAGE IOS app<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/t/bc600a59236d077c> > > Vijay Sharma <[email protected]> Oct 23 12:10AM +0530 > > Hello, > > It took quite long. I submitted it in afternoon and it is not yet > finished. > 2+5 also is still running. > > I downloaded from the App Store so I believe it must be the latest one. > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/df41fc1186b64d14> > > > Vijay Sharma <[email protected]> Oct 23 12:19AM +0530 > > Dima, > > Thanking you again. Definitely I can try and see if it goes fine. > It will be really great to have something like SAGE on my IPAD. > > Regards, > Vijay > > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/1a3142569a4ce48e> > > > Jason Grout <[email protected]> Oct 22 02:01PM -0500 > > On 10/22/12 1:40 PM, Vijay Sharma wrote: > > > It took quite long. I submitted it in afternoon and it is not yet > finished. > > 2+5 also is still running. > > > I downloaded from the App Store so I > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/52f44d5c7af887cb> > > > Vijay Sharma <[email protected]> Oct 23 12:41AM +0530 > > Jason, > > May I share that I access my internet through my office wireless and > currently I am working from home. > I will try it tomorrow and let you know. > > Really appreciate your quick feedback > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/e8962e3ce228975e> > > > Vijay Sharma <[email protected]> Oct 23 06:08PM +0530 > > Jason, > > Now at least the computations like sum and simple commands are getting > executed. > But it took long like an hour. > > But commands like plot3D etc. are taking huge time. Still running. > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/ed974427d67c24b8> > > > Ivan Andrus <[email protected]> Oct 23 03:42PM +0200 > > Could you give a specific example? I am not seeing the problem now > that the server has been restarted. Regardless, I think commands time out > long before an hour. I could be wrong though. > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/c243aa9b9808fb99> > > > Vijay Sharma <[email protected]> Oct 23 08:18PM +0530 > > Sure Jason, > > I can try after one week. > Also let me know if you need a helping hand for some coding. > I am not that advanced but can give an attempt to contribute something. > > Regards, > Vijay > > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/b4b91c43d735ba63> > > Bug in p.add_constraint > ?<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/t/5554d6844d30ee2d> > > Peter Mueller <[email protected]> Oct 23 01:36AM -0700 > > In Sage 5.3, I get the following: > > sage: p = MixedIntegerLinearProgram() > sage: x = p.new_variable(integer=True) > sage: c = x[0]-x[1] > sage: p.add_constraint(10 <= c) > sage: p.show() > Maximization: > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/fcce9a7242d82539> > > > Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> Oct 23 02:26AM -0700 > > Hellooooooooooooo !!! > > According to the doc, this seems to be a bug. Unfortunately, this > behavior > > produces wrong results. It took me some time to isolate the problem! > Bugs > > which just produce > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/4da139e77ac41203> > > > Volker Braun <[email protected]> Oct 23 02:41AM -0700 > > I'd say there are two bugs: > > 1) p.new_variable() should raise an error if it doesn't understand the > argument, and not just silently do nothing. > > 2) the inequality operators should work both ways > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/cbe3306524b466d5> > > > Volker Braun <[email protected]> Oct 23 02:48AM -0700 > > And, by the way, the MIP stuff has absolutely no support for any of > the > Sage infrastructure. Everything just derives from object. Not even > SageObject. > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 10:41:05 AM > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/65c78bd107b5998> > > > Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> Oct 23 01:44PM +0200 > > Here's a trac ticket that -- at least -- prints a bug report. > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13646 > > Nathann > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/d60dc1a29c0c63> > > > Nathann Cohen <[email protected]> Oct 23 01:45PM +0200 > > Hellooooooo !! > > > I'd say there are two bugs: > > There are always too many. > > > 1) p.new_variable() should raise an error if it doesn't understand > the argument, and not just silently do nothing. > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/2544dc56c8de1700> > > > P Purkayastha <[email protected]> Oct 23 10:08PM +0800 > > On 10/23/2012 05:26 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > Just the memories, and I am angry already. Today is not about to be a > > quiet day :-P > > > Nathann > > The earlier discussion happened here: > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/3e3f49ef3c53c2d3> > > > Volker Braun <[email protected]> Oct 23 07:24AM -0700 > > I've added the missing parents and coercion bits in a patch at the > trac > ticket. > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:44:03 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/e0fa0ffb8171c757> > > Upper convex hull ("inverse" Newton > polygon)<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/t/54b22a4eb65fe9bd> > > Christophe BAL <[email protected]> Oct 22 08:54PM +0200 > > Tanks. > > I don't like the output produced via *q.plot()*. Is there a way to > obtain > one basic line like *line* does ? > > Christophe > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/deb0205337264170> > > > Volker Braun <[email protected]> Oct 22 12:06PM -0700 > > You can always roll your own if you don't like it. You can also try to > take > apart the pieces that do the plot, for example, > > sage: proj = sage.geometry.polyhedron.plot.Projection(q) > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/d101180d94e2c880> > > > Harald Schilly <[email protected]> Oct 23 12:37AM -0700 > > On Monday, October 22, 2012 11:09:51 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > > sage: q = Polyhedron(vertices=points, rays=[(0,1)]) > > I just opened the documentation here: > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/3f6f55c2bccd5ced> > > > Volker Braun <[email protected]> Oct 23 03:15AM -0700 > > yes, should be equality. > > Btw if anybody feels adventurous I have a big pile of trac tickets > relating > to polyhedra that are sitting there for 1+ years. > > > > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/742b55109b089b13> > > > Christophe BAL <[email protected]> Oct 23 02:26PM +0200 > > Thanks for this. [?] > > 2012/10/22 Volker Braun <[email protected]> > > ...more<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/msg/3b6f7f3e4e4db155> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group > sage-support. > You can post via email <[email protected]>. > To unsubscribe from this group, > send<[email protected]>an empty message. > For more options, > visit<http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/topics>this group. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-support" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en. > > > -- Nathan Yeung Brigham Young University Department of Mathematics Computer Support Representative (801) 422-2459 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en.
