On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Sure <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! Built from source and now it works. > So there is a bug in sage binary distributions? I took > sage-5.8-linux-64bit-ubuntu_10.04.4_lts-x86_64-Linux.tar.lzma, > and ubuntu is based on debian. It really may call ATLAS, but what its fault > might cause such behaviour?
When you first installed and started the Sage binary did it give some terrifying warning message about missing CPU instructions, along with a message about how to disable the warning? If you got no such message, there is a bug -- the cpu checks should be more stringent -- what is the output of "cat /proc/cpuinfo" on your computer? If you did get such a message, well, you were warned :-) William > > On Friday, April 12, 2013 1:25:18 PM UTC+4, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Just compile Sage from source. Its a problem with your binaries, not with >> the Sage source code. >> >> >> On Friday, April 12, 2013 12:06:15 AM UTC+1, Sure wrote: >>> >>> Sorry, it is really 81 by 80, quite strange. But it still segfaults at >>> m.rank(). >>> md5: a9619508e02588d23290d63ae6f3ca44 mi.sobj >>>>> >>>>> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-support" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
