On Friday, May 10, 2013 3:19:15 PM UTC-4, Jeremy Daugherty wrote: > > On Friday, May 10, 2013 1:39:48 PM UTC-5, John H Palmieri wrote: > > On Friday, May 10, 2013 11:17:07 AM UTC-7, Jeremy Daugherty wrote:I'm > working on a project that is using an old version because the updates since > then take some necessary functionality out of it. We could update, but we > would have to re-factor a fairly large program to do it. >
I was wondering if this might have been the case. We have only deprecated a few things over the years - maybe this is something we can re-implement fairly easily? Any details would help us make a ticket to improve Sage. (Are you by chance working with Phil Yasskin's project?) > > This is a tar, we have a copy we have saved on our system. The main > reason why I've asked the question is because I've done a ./sage -b and it > said it needed to be made first, then I tried to make it and it failed > again. I've also tried to run it straight, but it isn't working that way > either, not to my surprise. > > > > Maybe your tar file is corrupted? Try downloading the source code for > 4.6 again from http://www.sagemath.org/src-old/ and rebuilding. > > > > -- > > John > > The project uses the 32 bit binaries, we're making an automatic partial > credit grader, using sage as the back end to check for errors in problems. > On what platform? Anyway, you can still get the source code for the 4.6, as John points out, and this would probably take care of things. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
