Le jeudi 13 juin 2013 16:54:50 UTC+2, Stephen Nuchia a écrit : > > I think the reason for it is probably because Sage variables are so often > words rather than letters When using LaTeX directly on formulas involving > typical programming variable names one has to override the "carefully tuned > spacing" in just this way. > > A patch to leave out the space when both sides of a product are numeric > literals,
Yikes ! In this case I'd keep the spacing (or add \cdot) ! I want some form of visual distinction between twelve times thirty-four and one thousand two hundreds thirty-four accessible *also* to presbytic and hypermetropic people. Unless you want to reinforce the canard pretending that an acceptable mathematician is a young (or myopic) mathematician... > single-letter variables Disputable but acceptable > or have non-default (user defined) latex forms OK. > would be a nice little project for somebody. > > On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 3:55:29 AM UTC-5, shersonb wrote: >> >> As it stands, latex(2*x) will return: >> >> 2 \, x >> >> and thus leaves a space between the 2 and the x when compiled. This does >> not look very good, IMO. Is there an option some where that I can set so >> that this behavior is avoided, so that the above will return "2 x" instead? >> > Shouldn't that be 2{}x instead ? Just asking... Emmanuel Charpentier > ~Brian >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.