On 22 August 2013 14:10, Daniel Krenn <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 2013-08-22 01:12, schrieb Robert Bradshaw:
>> Using a Python list is probably the fastest way to iterate over an
>> array of Python objects--it's a PyObject** under the hood and Cython
>> uses the C API calls to get at it.
>
> Ok, thanks for the clearification.
>
>> Your "check" might be the
>> bottleneck, especially if it's a Python call.
>
> I could remove that bottleneck. Now the bottleneck is in my original
> "something". I have to live with that. But, indeed, the list was not the
> problem. Thanks.
>
>> Also, no need to write this as a while loop; just use "for a in
>> range(1000000)" and it'll do the right thing (a C for loop).
>
> I used the while loop, since I want a to be Integer and not int (I need
> that for the calculations).

Then use srange() which yields Integers.

John

>
> Many thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-support" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to