On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:28:05 -0700 (PDT) kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 1:01:07 PM UTC-4, Peter Luschny wrote: > > > > Recently two integration test suites were discussed at > > sci.math.symbolic [1], [2]. > > > > I executed the tests with Sage and put the results on my webpage > > [3]. Not all results are favorable for Sage. Maybe this is worth to > > be noted by some Sage developers. Peter, many thanks for converting these to Sage syntax. > This is interesting, but especially because of your comment: > > A good answer gives FriCAS 1.2.1. It is a pitty that there is no > option 'fricas' in the selection box of Sage's integration algorithm. > > That is not a bad idea; in fact, it is > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9427. That's bitrotted quite a bit, > but probably someone (you?) could bring it up to speed. > > Also note http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9465 for upgrading Fricas. > > Also, as to these tests, I can see this fitting in sage/tests/ or > perhaps by analogy with the wester.py file. It would be great to have them in a file similar to wester.py. Can you open a ticket? Cheers, Burcin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
