> Binary is a completely functional program without any installer is >>> also often called a program binary, or binaries (as opposed to the >>> source code). >>> >> If the binaries are functional independent of different linux distributions, why would sagemath release binaries for fedora 16, ubuntu 10, 12, and debian 7 seperately? Why not to release one binary for linux instead? Also, why it is fedora 16 and not 20? I think this is confusing.
I don't think so or I can't say anything unless or until i don't see your >>> logs. >> >> I tried to compile sage three times from sources. The compile and test process lasts about 1 day in my computer. Unfortunately, I deleted all the log files from my computer and I am not willing to try recompiling again if I don't have to. For the time being, I am using the fedora 16 binary in my opensuse system with the hope that sagemath will run as intended. S. Sahin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
