> Thats it. The syntax is awful, do we agree on that ?
> -1, some method returns an abelian group and you don't know how it was > constructed without having to dig around. ? But when I create a group by myself which I want to be equal to Z/2Z * Z/3Z I end up with something different, isn't that a more important problem ? Right now, when I create MY group by writing is as I want as a product, I have to call __repr__ to see what it accepts as input. If a function built the group I can do the same, can't I ? Come on guys... Don't tell me that creating a group as a product and not even knowing how to convert a tuple to an element of my group is not a problem ! This vector trick is nice, but you can't expect anybody to figure it out immediately, and clearly the default behaviour is not the right one ! Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
