PS: A nicer way to create the libgap record from Python than evaluating strings is to hand it a Python dict: libgap(dict(a=1, b=2))
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:28:20 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:03:18 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote: >> >> On 2014-10-01, Dima Pasechnik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> sage: R = libgap.eval('rec(a:=1, b:=2)') >> >> sage: R.RecFields() # So, creating the record did work >> >> [ "b", "a" ] >> > >> > R is a Python dictionary >> >> No, it isn't. >> sage: type(R) >> <type 'sage.libs.gap.element.GapElement_Record'> >> but... > > > Libgap records behaves like a Python dict, and libgap lists behave like > Python lists. They are of course not, strictly speaking, the same. > > You can also use R.sage() to convert the record to a Python dict. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
