Hello ! > Thank you very much. With your help I was able to compile the library from > the "new" sources and it is working properly now, although just for me of > course.
"Good" :-P > I understand your disappointment because of not being able to solve > the issue for everybody. > > I am willing to write to the author of the C code but I do not know what > exactly to ask him to do. The main problem is that the code works right in > some architectures (at least in ours and in the one of the author I guess). Well... Probably that it would be cool if they could try to test and debug it under Mac OS X (seems like it aways fails on this architecture), for there are known bugs and that their code returns wrong results on this platform. I don't exactly know how to make them understand that this is important O_o > So what is needed the most is active involvement from some other Sage user > interested in having the modular_decomposition package to work in a > different architecture so as detect what should be modified in the C code to > make it work in that architecture too. Is there someone out there? Someone with a mac. Someone who preferably knows french, as the all comments are in french. > I really appreciate your effort to make modular decomposition available in > Sage because for some of us this is very useful. I think that keeping > modular_decomposition as an optional package should be useful for testing > purposes in different architectures until the portability problem with the > source code is identified and solved. I have to day that I am a bit pessimistic. The code has been in Sage's source tree for years already :-/ Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
