On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:48 PM, R. Andrew Ohana <[email protected]> wrote: > There are a number of ways in which sage assumes you only have a single > version of python installed. The main reason for introducing the python3 > package was so developers interested in porting sage to python 3 could > easily try building sage with python 3 instead of python 2.
I think by definition optional packages shouldn't destroy an existing Sage install beyond all repair. In my experience many enthusiastic users will try to install all optional packages. It's a pretty standard thing to do given the option. The OP's question is 'Shouldn't we displace python3 in "experimental" packages ?', and I think the answer should be YES! William -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
