Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, William Stein wrote: > >> I was really surprised when I started Sage that people would often try >> to **install all optional packages**, then report anything that went >> wrong. I bet people still try to do this...
Well, it's good if people test they're still working, and not rottening. The dependencies of (also optional) "new-style" packages at least are handled automatically now. (And cleaning up / converting old-style packages is just happening once again.) > Isn't it supposed to work... And on the servers I would like to have > good coverage of features. This is not sage-specific: I can guess that > some users here will use R and some might use Octave, so why not install > both of them? (Well, nowadays I can just forward them to our Sage-server.) > > Of course I will not install all packages for, say, Ubuntu Linux, but > Sage has not that many available. As mentioned on the ticket Dima created, the python3 package should still have type "experimental" at this point. -leif -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
