On Monday, September 19, 2016 at 6:02:22 AM UTC-7, Paul Leopardi wrote:
> I am trying to use global variables to control the behaviour of Python
> functions called from Sage. (Yes, I know there is probably a better way to
> do it, but I am still interested in what's going on here.)
> If in foo.py I have
> def bar():
> print blah
> def baz():
> global zilch
> zilch = 0
> A "global" variable is a "module global" variable. Since you're always
executing code that is in some module (that's what __main__ is for)
and, in Sage I do:
> sage: from foo import bar
> sage: global blah
> sage: blah = 1
> sage: bar()
If you spell that foo.blah = 1 it should work (perhaps after executing
"import foo" in order to have the "foo module namespace" bound to the
toplevel variable "foo")
> sage: from foo import baz
> sage: baz()
> sage: print zilch
> Is there a way in Sage that I can assign to a global variable that a
> called Python function will recognize as a global variable?
> Thanks, Paul
This is just a python thing: you share global data across modules by making
sure that this data is bound in a namespace to which both modules have
There is no really "global" namespace in sage. There's "toplevel", but that
will generally not be the interactive namespace that a sage interface is
using, given that ipython, jupyter, and sagenb run "above" your sage code.
You can try and hack your way to the "interactive" namespace. The toplevel
"var" in sage does that for injection. That's generally fragile, though.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.