If by mapping to R you mean applying sage: R( f )
then, no, this doesn't work. I'll see if I can post an example to make this more concrete. Andrew On Thursday, 21 June 2018 15:51:31 UTC+2, slelievre wrote: > > Have you tried defining > > sage: R.<c0, c1, c2, c3, u0, u1, q, h> = LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ) > > and maping everything to R so it gets simplified? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
