Dear Nils, dear list,

Le jeudi 8 juillet 2021 à 01:01:44 UTC+2, Nils Bruin a écrit :

> I think the main problem in f(x) is a preparser problem: 
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11621
>

This is likely ; I don't see how to check this, but I'll accept it for now.


The other problems could just be numerical instability. The normal 
> precision is 53 bits, which is good for about 16 decimal digits. The 
> constants in the formula are more than that, so if there is significant 
> cancellation, it may be this is just expected. Perhaps try and evaluatie 
> with a larger precision? .n(500) or so? If the answers are now closer then 
> it could just be numerical. The factored expression should give a different 
> evaluation scheme for what is presumably the same quantity.
>

This does not happen : the discrepancy does not change when raising the 
precision.

I still think that something is wroing in SR handling, and I'll try to 
exhibit it in an understandable way. Stay tuned...

Thanks a lot !
 

> On Wednesday, 7 July 2021 at 13:46:33 UTC-7 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
>> The same ask.sagemath question 
>> <https://ask.sagemath.org/question/57859/wrong-result-after-using-factor-known-sage-bug/>
>>  
>> may have revealed two different bugs in symbolics handling.
>> Input interpretation. Raw input, with spaces, indents and newlines : 
>>
>> f(x) = (3/174465461165747500*pi*(-1750000*I*pi*x^3 - 31250000*(224*pi + 
>> 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025)*x^2
>>                                 + 17500000000000000*I*pi*x)
>>         *sqrt(92821652156334811582567480952850314403/10*pi^2/(224*pi + 
>> 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025)
>>               + 98489794142024498175862287197250000*pi*sqrt(448*pi + 2025)
>>               /(224*pi + 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025) + 
>> 7713517620898636162808584411766250000*pi
>>               /(224*pi + 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025) + 
>> 659225266976959904108326638192187500*sqrt(448*pi + 2025)
>>               /(224*pi + 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025) + 
>> 29665137013963195684874698718648437500
>>               /(224*pi + 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025))
>>         /(63*pi^2*x^4 - (504000*I*pi^2 + 67500*I*pi*(sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 
>> 45))*x^3
>>           - 3000000*(560224*pi^2 + 45*pi*(sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 45))*x^2 + 
>> 8400000000000000000000*pi^2
>>           - (-5040000000000000*I*pi^2 - 675000000000000*I*pi*(sqrt(448*pi + 
>> 2025) + 45))*x))
>>
>> Single-line reformatted code (deleting blanks, indents and newlines, 
>> adding a space before ‘+’ and ‘-‘) 
>>
>> g(x) = (3/174465461165747500*pi*(-1750000*I*pi*x^3 - 31250000*(224*pi + 
>> 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025)*x^2 + 
>> 17500000000000000*I*pi*x)*sqrt(92821652156334811582567480952850314403/10*pi^2/(224*pi
>>  + 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025) + 
>> 98489794142024498175862287197250000*pi*sqrt(448*pi + 2025)/(224*pi + 
>> 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025) + 
>> 7713517620898636162808584411766250000*pi/(224*pi + 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 
>> 2025) + 659225266976959904108326638192187500*sqrt(448*pi + 2025)/(224*pi + 
>> 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 2025) + 
>> 29665137013963195684874698718648437500/(224*pi + 45*sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 
>> 2025))/(63*pi^2*x^4 - (504000*I*pi^2 + 67500*I*pi*(sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 
>> 45))*x^3 - 3000000*(560224*pi^2 + 45*pi*(sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 45))*x^2 + 
>> 8400000000000000000000*pi^2 - (-5040000000000000*I*pi^2 - 
>> 675000000000000*I*pi*(sqrt(448*pi + 2025) + 45))*x))
>>
>> Notwithstanding formatting differences, these functions should be equal ; 
>> they are *not* :
>>
>> sage: f(1).n()
>> 418409.917305474 + 1.28757494213663e11*I
>> sage: g(1).n()
>> 1.39111866114058e-12 + 6.95559330500736e-6*I
>>
>> factor bug 
>>
>> sage: F = f.real()^2 + f.imag()^2
>> sage: Ff = (f.real()^2 + f.imag()^2).factor()
>> sage: G = g.real()^2 + g.imag()^2
>> sage: Gf = (g.real()^2 + g.imag()^2).factor()
>> sage: F(1).n()
>> 1.65784923163565e22
>> sage: Ff(1).n()
>> 4.77205703148314e29
>> sage: G(1).n()
>> 4.83802782246652e-11
>> sage: Gf(1).n()
>> 0.00139260822082924
>>
>> These two bugs may have a common origin in SR code (pynac comes to mind).
>>
>> My question is : how to file bugs about these ones, which seem extremely 
>> serious (silent errors in basic symbolics abilities) ?
>> ​
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/05ae081c-bf95-465a-96f8-39aa2443d450n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to