On Monday 18 March 2024 at 06:45:17 UTC-7 Hellen Colman wrote: "A graph represents an *antisymmetric relation* if ... "

It is not saying a graph is antisymmetric, but is introducing a new definition of antisymmetric relation. Ah, indeed! The person must have been interested in transitive relations and probably thought of the transitive relation represented by a digraph. It does make sense to represent a transitive relation by only a partial graph whose transitive closure gives the relation of interest. So the routine as-is could be documented as "a graph represents a transitive relation that is antisymmetric if ...". Then it's a question if the other meaning is worthwhile to have available as well. That splits the change into a simple bugfix by updating the documentation and a possible new feature (including renaming of methods, if desired) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/61b6b91e-f57c-4bae-8a43-dcc3aa12be99n%40googlegroups.com.