On January 21, 2026 4:08:42 AM CST, Eric Gourgoulhon <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>Hi John, 
>
>Since you are using Ubuntu, you may find this page useful:
>https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/install_ubuntu.html
>I'm trying to maintain it up to date, in order to provide Ubuntu new comers 
>to Sage with a quick way to install Sage. In particular the list of system 
>packages in the "sudo apt install" line is up to date. Last time I checked 
>the list posted at
>https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source-distro.html#linux-system-package-installation
>it was not the case: the command "sudo apt-get install" was failing with 
>Ubuntu 24.04 because of some wrong package names , which is quite 
>disturbing for a new comer. I've tried to edit the doc.sagemath.org page to 
>fix that, but the list is automatically generated and I could not find 
>quickly how to change it by editing some source file. 

package lists are generated from
build/pkgs/*/distros/*.txt

(for Debian/Ubuntu the 2nd * should be "debian")

please open a PR to fix these names 


>
>Eric.
>
>
>Le mercredi 21 janvier 2026 à 10:53:22 UTC+1, John Cremona a écrit :
>
>> Thanks (as always) Dima.   There do seem to be more than one place where 
>> installation instructions can be found.   I thought I was being a good 
>> citizen by actually reading the version  I found instead of relying on my 
>> past experience.
>>
>> Most of the build worked fine (but see below) after ./bootstrap && 
>> ./configure (after which "make configure" reports that 'configure' is up to 
>> date).
>>
>> I found that on a system running ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS the package qhull 
>> fails to build as it want cmake version 3.25 or higher while this system 
>> only has 3.22.1 available.  I wonder if the later version is really 
>> necessary.  I am hesitant to upgrade the OS as I do not have physical 
>> access to the machine without a lot of hassle: it is in a central 
>> university server room, and we don't like to remind the relevant 
>> authorities that they still house some of our servers.  It is also 13 years 
>> old but still rather useful even if it still only has sage version 10.6 on 
>> it.
>>
>> John 
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 20 January 2026 at 23:21:19 UTC Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>> <https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source-distro.html>
>>>
>>>
>>> On January 20, 2026 12:53:29 PM CST, 'Martin R' via sage-support <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I see the following on 
>>>> https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/walkthrough.html
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> Development Walk-through
>>>>
>>>> This section is a concise overview of the Sage development process. We 
>>>> will see how to make changes to the Sage source code and record them in 
>>>> the 
>>>> Git revision control system.
>>>> Quick start 
>>>>
>>>> If you are in a hurry, you can skip the details and just follow these 
>>>> steps:
>>>>
>>>>    1. 
>>>>    
>>>>    Install Git (see Installing Git 
>>>>    
>>>> <https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/git_setup.html#section-git-install>)
>>>>  
>>>>    and Conda 
>>>>    <https://github.com/conda-forge/miniforge?tab=readme-ov-file#install>
>>>>    .
>>>>    
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> is this the wrong page?
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, 20 January 2026 at 15:42:04 UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure you are misreading the documentation. 
>>>>>
>>>>> The installation guide has tabs to choose the platform and the OS, and 
>>>>> it refers to the development guide for installation from source. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On January 20, 2026 5:32:25 AM CST, John Cremona <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>> >I have been building Sage on linux computers for 20 years. I 
>>>>> >currently have a working 10.9.beta0 on my laptop but also need to keep 
>>>>> >working versions (not development versions) on other ubuntu machines. 
>>>>> >I have never in my life knowingly used conda and I don't know what it 
>>>>> >is. BUT the installation guides tell me that I should install conda 
>>>>> >-- both for installing a development version and for a non-development 
>>>>> >version. 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> >This cannot be necessary as I have never used or installed conda, and 
>>>>> >I have built version 10.9.beta0. 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> >Please can someone confirm that it is still OK to clone the latest 
>>>>> >version (let's say, the latest release), do ./bootstrap and 
>>>>> >./configure and make? Followed by (e.g.) make 
>>>>> >database_cremona_ellcurve? 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> >John 
>>>>> > 
>>>>>
>>>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/FDC5EB31-CA5D-4B8C-AA01-5F33462096B0%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to