#4164: [with patch, needs work] Make triangulated_facial_incidences() work in 
all
cases (and decomment render_solid())
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  anakha    |        Owner:  anakha    
     Type:  defect    |       Status:  assigned  
 Priority:  major     |    Milestone:  sage-3.1.3
Component:  graphics  |   Resolution:            
 Keywords:            |  
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by mhampton):

  * summary:  [with patch, needs review] Make
              triangulated_facial_incidences() work in all
              cases (and decomment render_solid()) => [with
              patch, needs work] Make
              triangulated_facial_incidences() work in all
              cases (and decomment render_solid())

Comment:

 First of all let me say thanks for working on this.  There are some
 problems with these patches though:

 1) They don't pass doctesting on my machine.  This is because of some
 output order differences.  Did you test the final combination of all three
 patches?  Otherwise it might be architecture-specific but looking at your
 code that seems unlikely.

 2) In higher dimensions, "triangulation" usually means a decomposition
 into simplices - so in four dimensions the elements of a triangulation of
 a face should be tetrahedra.  It occurs to me that it would perhaps be
 best to write a function in the Polyhedra class that triangulates (in this
 sense) the polyhedra itself, and then for
 .triangulated_facial_incideneces() call this function on the polyhedrons
 generated by each face.

 3) Things seem to break for bigger examples.  For instance, an octohedron:
 {{{
 sage: p_oct = Polyhedron(vertices =
 [[0,1],[0,2],[1,0],[2,0],[3,1],[3,2],[1,3],[2,3]])
 sage: p_oct.triangulated_facial_incidences()

 [[0, [3, 4, 3]],
  [1, [2, 3, 2]],
  [2, [0, 2, 0]],
  [3, [0, 1, 0]],
  [4, [1, 6, 1]],
  [5, [6, 7, 6]],
  [6, [5, 7, 5]],
  [7, [4, 5, 4]]]
 }}}

 Notice that the triangulation consists of the edges.

 Do you have a reference for the algorithm you are using, or are you coming
 up with one yourself?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4164#comment:4>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to