#4179: [with patch, needs review] ell_finite_field.py "long" doctest fails
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: GeorgSWeber | Owner: GeorgSWeber
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-3.1.3
Component: doctest | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment (by cremona):
I'm not so keen on making this change, since this test was put in
originally to show that a previous bug was fixed. It is natural to use a
sequence of primes starting at 2, but not so natural to use a sequence
like prime_range(32768, 42768).
Given that we are tracking the root problem anyway, can we not live with
this one doctest failure which only occurs on one type of machine with the
long option anyway?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4179#comment:3>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
