#525: Get Pete Chvany's build notes into the SAGE docs.
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: mabshoff
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.1.3
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
Is this ticket still relevant? If so, can someone explain its purpose to
me? Who is the target audience for the attached document?
For example, the document says 'These instructions assume a basic level of
Unix command-line fluency.' But in this case, how much of this needs to be
explained?
For another example, it seems like a bad idea (items 3 and 4) to delete
the old copy of sage, at least not until you're sure that the new one
doesn't break things (the way the notebook was somewhat broken for a few
releases). If we want instructions like this somewhere (in the
installation guide, I suppose), I would not include them as is...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/525#comment:3>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
