#686: [with patch, positive review] write MPolynomial_libsingular over number
fields
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: malb | Owner: malb
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.1.3
Component: basic arithmetic | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by mabshoff):
Replying to [comment:10 AlexGhitza]:
> * a few places in the docstrings have SAGE instead of Sage; we really
ought to pick one (and AFAIK this has been done) and stick with it.
The agreed upon spelling these days is Sage. The problem with malb's patch
is that there is no TeX macro, so as is the documentation fails to build.
But I will just add the {{{\Sage}}} macro to {{{commontex/macros-
new.tex}}} so that this issue is gone once and for all. Once we make the
ReST transition we should use Sage instead of SAGE or sage in the
documentation.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/686#comment:11>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
