#4335: [with patch, needs review] Labelling of newforms
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: ljpk | Owner: craigcitro
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-3.2
Component: modular forms | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by craigcitro):
* status: new => assigned
* summary: Labelling of newforms => [with patch, needs review] Labelling
of newforms
Comment:
Sorry, I couldn't wait until Thursday. :) I think William's comment is
right -- I probably just never tested this with anything except `a`, since
that's the letter I usually use.
However, raising an error if no variable name is provided is, in fact, the
intended behavior -- basically obeying the rule of "explicit is better
than implicit."
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4335#comment:2>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
