#4397: [with patch; need review] Sage 3.1.4: optional doctest failure in
sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mabshoff | Owner: was
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: doctest | Resolution: invalid
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by mabshoff):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
* milestone: sage-3.2 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Comment:
I think the solution here are the two extcode patches that were missing
from #2171. With those two patches applied and the database_gap.spkg
installed I get
{{{
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle/sage-3.1.3.final$ ./sage -t
-long -optional devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
sage -t -long -optional devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py
*** Warning: large Minkowski bound: certification will be VERY long.
*** Warning: large Minkowski bound: certification will be VERY long.
[45.4 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 45.4 seconds
}}}
Hence: Invalid, sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4397#comment:3>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
