#3810: [with patch, with positive  review ] make abelian group list/iter and
classgroup list/iter more modern
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  ncalexan       |        Owner:  was       
     Type:  enhancement    |       Status:  new       
 Priority:  minor          |    Milestone:  sage-3.2.2
Component:  number theory  |   Resolution:            
 Keywords:                 |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by cremona):

  * summary:  [with patch, with positive  review (almost)] make abelian
              group list/iter and classgroup list/iter more
              modern => [with patch, with positive  review ]
              make abelian group list/iter and classgroup
              list/iter more modern

Comment:

 I hope I have done this right.  I took a clone of 3.2.1 and applied the
 (already merged) patches at #4061, which included a fix for trivial
 abelian group list().  I merged Nick's two patches from this ticket,
 adapting them accordingly and fixing the trivial group thing I mentioned
 above, adding a doctest.  The result became the "combined" patch attached
 here.   It looks strange when you view it because the file
 abelian_groups.py has two successive diffs, but I tried applying this
 patch to a fresh clone (+#4061) and it does end up in the right state.

 If this makes sense to Michael, and works for him, I hope this will finish
 off this one.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3810#comment:11>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to