#3810: [with patch, positive review] make abelian group list/iter and classgroup
list/iter more modern
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncalexan | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-3.2.2
Component: number theory | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by cremona):
Replying to [comment:15 mabshoff]:
> Replying to [comment:14 cremona]:
>
> Hi John,
>
> > What a nuisance; sorry, I only did a 32-bit test at the weekend.
The got/expected are equally valid mathematically, and my guess is that
the difference comes from the pari library.
>
> Yes, Nick said the same thing in IRC, but I was asleep at that point.
>
> > Would it be dishonest to look for an example for the doctest where the
output was identical on 32- and 64-bit machines?
>
> I am fine marking those two doctests with #32 bit and #64 bit output and
to get the patch in. If anybody wants to have a "prettier" doctest that
can be addressed via a followup patch.
Sounds good to me. If it is more random than that it will be picked up by
the merry horde of alpha testers....
John
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3810#comment:16>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
